Services

Quality engineering, without the overhead.

Senior QA automation and AI-driven testing, packaged as clear engagements. Pick the one that fits where your team is today — or combine a few.

What I offer

Ways to work together.

Every engagement is hands-on. No slide decks, no generic recommendations — just execution, documentation, and a team that owns the output when we're done.

  • Test automation frameworks

    A maintainable automation framework built from scratch — architected for your stack, your team, and your release cadence.

    • Framework architecture & setup
    • UI, API & end-to-end suites
    • Coding standards & patterns
    • Documentation & handover
  • CI/CD quality integration

    Automated testing wired into your delivery pipeline, so quality is checked on every commit — not after release.

    • Tests running in your pipeline
    • Quality gates & branch policies
    • Coverage & test reporting
    • Azure DevOps, GitHub or Jenkins
  • API test automation

    Specialized automated coverage for your APIs and microservices — contracts, integration and regression, validated continuously.

    • Functional & contract tests
    • Integration & regression suites
    • Data-driven scenarios
    • Pipeline integration
  • QA strategy & assessment

    A clear-eyed review of where your quality process stands today, and a practical roadmap for where it should go.

    • Current-state assessment
    • Tooling & coverage analysis
    • Prioritized improvement roadmap
    • Quick-win recommendations
  • AI-powered QA

    Bring AI into the quality cycle — generate test cases, sharpen acceptance criteria, and triage failures faster.

    • Test case & edge-case generation
    • User story & criteria refinement
    • Failure triage with LLMs
    • Practical, in-flow adoption
  • Fractional QA lead

    Senior QA leadership embedded part-time — direction, standards and mentorship, without a full-time hire.

    • Embedded QA leadership
    • Process & standards ownership
    • Team mentorship & reviews
    • Flexible monthly engagement
How I work

From first call to team autonomy.

Every engagement follows the same four-step pattern — so you always know what's happening and what comes next.

  1. Discover

    We start with a focused conversation about your stack, team size, release cadence, and current pain points — so the engagement is scoped to what actually matters.

  2. Plan

    You receive a clear, written proposal: scope, deliverables, timeline, and success criteria. No vague retainers, no scope creep.

  3. Build

    Hands-on execution — frameworks, pipelines, training sessions, or strategy docs — delivered incrementally so you see progress from week one.

  4. Hand over

    Every engagement ends with your team owning the output: documented, tested, and integrated. The goal is autonomy, not dependency.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

We already have manual testers — why do we need automation?

Manual testing catches exploratory issues; automation catches regressions at speed. As your release cadence increases, manual-only coverage becomes the bottleneck. Automation doesn't replace testers — it frees them to do the work machines can't.

We don't have time to set up a framework right now.

That's exactly when it matters most. A poor-quality release costs more time than the setup. The framework is built for you, not by you — your team sees working tests from week one without stopping feature work.

Our APIs change too often to keep tests up to date.

Contract and data-driven tests are designed for change. When the structure is right, updating a test for a schema change takes minutes. Without tests, a breaking change in production takes days to diagnose.

We tried a QA strategy document before and nothing changed.

An assessment without a prioritized action plan is just a report. What you get here is a ranked roadmap with quick wins you can act on immediately — not a slide deck that sits in a drawer.

We're not sure AI tools are mature enough for our QA process.

The AI-powered QA service doesn't replace your process — it plugs into it. LLMs generate test cases and triage failures; your team reviews and decides. The risk is low; the time saved on repetitive tasks is immediate.

We need a full-time QA lead but can't justify the headcount yet.

A fractional engagement gives you senior direction, standards, and mentorship at a fraction of the cost. When the business is ready for a full-time hire, you'll already have the processes and culture in place to onboard them properly.

Get started

Ready to raise the quality bar?

Tell me about your stack, your team, and your biggest QA pain point. I'll come back with a concrete proposal — no obligations.